![]() |
| Photo by Matt Hurst http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2475/3911933132_76d8a8cbac.jpg |
Meanwhile, David Byrne, writer of "Learning to Love PowerPoint," argues that PowerPoint is an useful artistic medium. He mentions that, at the beginning, he created presentations with little content. However, he soon learned that he could add short videos, photos, music, and scanned images to the presentations. He also learned that the presentations could be run on a timer so that no one was required. Byrne seems to realize what a convenience that PowerPoint is both as an art form and as a form of business presentation.
When I think of PowerPoint, it is mostly thoughts of presenting scholarly or business related material to a crowd. I do not see it as an artistic medium as much, but I also do not see it as a degradation of speech when used effectively. Effective use for me includes: showing visuals and speaking about them, adding sound when necessary for a particular topic, keeping animation on a down-low to avoid distraction, and as a way of showing lists or reading notes. My version of effective use, for the most part, involves the PowerPoint being a visual while I attempt to do the speaking. I believe that my vision of PowerPoint differs from the vision of both of the writers', because my vision simply involves providing an entertaining visual to accompany a speech instead of using PowerPoint for art or just using it without an accompanying speech. A PowerPoint presentation does not (and should not) just give itself in a business or class setting.

No comments:
Post a Comment